Video Experiment #2
Behind the Green Door
2024-06-29
One main reason I have avoided doing video to this point is I suspect the amount of effort required to produce minimally acceptable video content is much higher than what is required to produce minimally acceptable audio content. The phrase “minimally acceptable” here is purely subjective and that judgement lies with me. I try to avoid doing anything that I do not think meets my minimal standards of acceptability. For example, in the case of the podcast, the quality should be good enough for the listener to be able to hear everything, and not be distracted by random sounds. Nothing worse than listening to a show with dogs barking in the background or the audio cutting in and out, so I make sure to avoid that stuff. At the same time, podcasts should not be over-produced as I think they lose their authenticity. Too good and they sound fake to me.Video is a different animal. If I am going to watch even a short video, I want to be able to see everything clearly like I would with a professionally produced video. It is what I am used to and what I assume most people are used to expecting. That does not mean movie quality, but the expectations are higher than with a podcast. The video and audio should be close to the professional level and that means more effort to produce them.What I have found with video is you need more prep time to do a video than to do an audio show because of the limits of editing. When recording the podcast, I often talk myself into a dead end and then stop, go back to some convenient restarting point, cut out the jibber-jabber and continue recording from there. Once in a while you can probably tell I clipped a section here or there, but it is never very obvious.With video, this is not easy. For starters, the video editing software is all bloatware so doing simple tasks is a chore. Cutting and splicing video is also far more difficult because it is so much easier to see the edits. Then you have the issue of matching the audio to the video if you are shooting video of yourself talking about what you are seeing. Video editing comes with many more hurdles than audio editing.Probably the biggest challenge for me is the language. I still only know about ten percent of the lingo used in audio editing. I have had no reason to learn what a Reverse High Filter EQ Back Straddle Twist edit does. There is no need for me to know this stuff as I am not producing classical music tracks. I just need to filter out ambient noises, my “ums and uhs”, and the occasional bellowing of Devil Cat.With video, there is a whole new language and none of it makes much sense to me. For example, the simple act of shrinking a video by a few seconds so that it goes from ten minutes and ten seconds to exactly ten minutes apparently requires a trip to Mordor to fetch a special ring of power. Video editing is a jobs program and as such the video editing guild has made it as opaque as humanly possible with esoteric language.Anyway, the plan is to entertain myself learning this stuff until I either reach the minimally acceptable level or I find a new hobby. I have recently discovered the world of LED track lighting, which is something I plan to use in the basement project. It comes with lots of fiddly gadgets and the chance to electrocute myself. Maybe I can combine video editing with the art of dodging stray electrons while wiring up LED lighting.
Comments (Historical)
The comments below were originally posted to thedissident.substack.com.
Transcript
The transcript below was generated by Substack.
Well, welcome to my screen porch.
I'm playing around with this tripod.
I guess they call it a tripod.
It's a telescoping tripod.
It's got three little feet on it.
Actually, I guess it works pretty good.
The only problem with it is there's really no way to lock it,
so there's some possibility that...
Well,
I mean,
there is a way to lock it.
It just doesn't work very well.
So there's some possibility that while I'm recording this,
the camera will drop two feet and you'll be looking at a wall.
But that's the way it goes.
I tried an experiment with audio.
And I,
which basically meant buying what the internet said was a good mic for this kind of
camera and the internet lied.
It doesn't work.
It turns out I have to have a Bluetooth with this version of the GoPro.
It's a GoPro 12,
even though,
you know,
the internet said,
oh,
it works for all these models,
but what are you going to do?
So $30 down the drain, although it might work with something else.
I think it has a plug,
so it'll plug into my Google,
my Android,
or I guess whatever else I might be using.
I guess it would work on my tablet, perhaps.
I don't know.
I can't think of a reason why I would need a mic for my tablet or my Android, but who knows.
You never know.
I have a whole box full of crap like that that I've bought or bought for something
else and that something else has gone away and I held on to it because I thought,
you know,
who knows.
When I moved, I found three boxes that were labeled computer parts.
And there was a lot of stuff.
I mean, there's some stuff that went back a long way.
I kept it because you never know.
About 10 years ago, I ran into a problem with an antique server that was 20 years old.
And I had to recover data off of it.
And no one could do it.
And I had old parts for an antique Unix server.
And when I'm putting it back together, I managed to actually get the disk up and get the data off.
So that lesson has carried me for 20 years of collecting crap that I put in a box called computer parts.
Well, anyway, I figured I should have a hot take on the whole debate business.
I mean, I posted some stuff up on Twitter.
I don't know.
I mean, I think it...
I think everybody has probably said everything that needs to be said about the debate itself.
The one thing that I think I should elaborate on is that people took me to task in
the comments of my site and on Twitter for saying I felt it was sad.
I found it depressing to see this husk of an old man stuck out there and really just,
I don't know,
I mean,
it was grotesque.
I mean, that's really what it was.
I mean, he's a guy who should be at home.
waiting for the icy hand of death.
That's really what he should be doing.
And it's not that I feel sorry for him, Joe Biden, the man.
Joe Biden, the man, for the most part, is gone now.
That's just the husk that's left over.
And he doesn't have any agency now.
He doesn't have control of himself.
He's not the guy making decisions.
You can see that.
It's plainly obvious.
And so that makes me sad.
I don't want to see that.
I think
Old people should have,
I think,
dignity at that stage of your life where you really only got months maybe or a year left.
It should be in private.
I mean, I think that's the way it should be.
And maybe I think this way because those years are a lot closer for me now than
they were when I was a young man.
Maybe if I was 20 years younger, I'd think different.
I don't know.
But anyway, my thinking is,
They're going to have to replace them.
At some point, they're going to go to the White House or have some sort of conversation.
Apparently, there's some sort of fundraiser over Fourth of July week.
This week coming up in Washington, all the Pauls will be out shaking down rich people for money.
That's how it works.
They'll be getting their instructions.
Usually,
staffers get sent off to re-education camps so that they get the latest thing and
get prepared for
The late summer, you know, this will run through July into August.
And then, you know, they're all ready for their talking points and the media is all prepared.
You know, it's just the way Washington works in the summer.
But, you know, there's going to be rich people, powerful people who will sit down with the Bidens.
And I think because it's what,
October,
not October,
August something or other is when the Democratic Convention is.
So they've got a month, let's say.
I think it's like the first or second week of August.
So they've got a month.
And,
you know,
if they can convince him to step aside or convince his family mostly,
I think it's his wife that's really the driving force here,
that,
you know,
look,
step aside and they'll make sure that the Bidens don't get prosecuted by whoever
fills the spot.
You know, presumably it'd be Trump, but who knows?
You know, they might get lucky and find someone who catches fire with the public.
But the truth is, is that there were so many shenanigans in the 2020 election.
There's a non-trivial chance that this shenanigans machine just rolls along.
You know, there's no one can stop this damn thing.
And Biden gets 90 million votes.
I mean, that would just be devastating to the regime because no one would assume it's fixed.
I mean,
even people who actually hate Trump would say,
yeah,
I mean,
there's no way that this vegetable,
this man who can barely stand up,
got 90 million votes.
But it's possible.
So if they push him aside and they put somebody in like Gavin McGinnis,
not Gavin McGinnis,
I always say that,
Gavin Newsom,
and then the shenanigans machine gives him 90 million votes,
well,
they can come up with a story and maybe people will believe it.
Enough people would believe it that it would probably work.
Probably.
And look, they could bring in Newsom and find some younger woman.
There's got to be some senator or a congressman.
I forgot all about her.
I thought first about that senator from Minnesota who actually did better than they
expected in the 2020 primary.
I forget what her name is.
Kovachar, that's it.
Or they could get Gretchen Whitmer.
I mean, she's in her 40s, so you could have, I think, is she in her 40s?
Maybe 50s, something like that.
Either way, I mean, they're a generation younger than Trump.
And so they could put those two together and say, we're going with the youth movement.
We learned our lesson.
We pushed aside the old people.
And it's time for you,
Mr.
and Mrs.
America,
or Mr.
and Mr.
America,
given it's the Democrats,
you need to vote for this youth ticket.
And it would probably work.
I mean, it would work enough so that the shenanigans machine wouldn't be so obvious.
You know, I mean, that's the real trick.
You know, pulling shenanigans in an election, it happens all the time.
Democrats have been doing this since forever,
since the old Democratic machines in New York City and Chicago and Boston and Philadelphia.
But it can't be so much that people say, wait a second, this is unbelievable.
I mean, that's where you get into trouble.
That's where people get out into the streets.
And I think that was the problem in 2020.
They just went overboard.
You know,
if they had figured out,
you know,
some way or another to,
you know,
I don't know,
have Biden squeak by,
it might be believable,
you know,
especially if it would have been the reverse where Biden was leading all night and
then Trump got close but just fell short.
but have those midnight pallets of ballots showing up.
It was just too obvious.
So they could run Newsom and Whitmer,
let's say,
and there's probably some other females out there they could put on the ticket just
to have a younger female on.
I don't think there's any black females around they'd want to run,
although they could run that,
what's her name,
Cocker or Crockett,
that crazy black woman from Houston.
That would be hilarious.
But, you know, I think she's too young.
But anyway, you get the idea.
And that would probably work.
I mean,
it would be close enough where they could lie their way through it and they,
you know,
keep the party going.
Or on the other hand,
they just very well may say,
you know what,
we're just going to cut a deal with Trump.
He's amenable to a deal.
And I think, you know, Trump at this point just wants to win.
I think he just wants vindication.
That's about it.
I don't know.
I mean, I'm not as sour on Trump as a lot of people.
I couldn't help but laugh at the anti-Semites who were growling and moaning and
groaning that Trump didn't stand up there and praise Hitler and tell the world how
much he hates Jews.
I mean,
even if Trump did that,
even if he showed up in a Nazi outfit with a little mustache and gave Hitler speeches,
these people would still complain.
I mean, it really is nuts.
But anyway,
speaking of which,
that was the one thing I didn't – no one seemed to notice is that Trump clearly was
very prepared for the debate in the first 15 minutes.
And then he realized that the whole next day and the weekend was going to be about
Biden's terrible mental condition.
And so he changed gears.
It was pretty obvious.
He shifted gears and said he was just going to repeat a couple of things.
The veterans business, the stuff about Israel, the Ukraine business and immigration.
He kept saying immigration over and over and over again.
And I think he did that on purpose.
I think he decided that,
hey,
no one's going to remember anything he has to say other than those few things he repeats.
All the talk is going to be about Biden.
So just, you know, shoehorn a couple of points in there and forget about all the prepared stuff.
That's what it looked like to me because his first couple of answers were really good.
I mean, better than usual, which I was surprised by.
But then he just kind of got into this weird habit of just kind of circling back.
Every question was about something else.
And he talked about immigration or how veterans are sleeping on the streets and
immigrants are in big hotels,
that kind of stuff.
So I don't know.
Maybe he just lost his train of thought.
I mean, think about how hard it would be to be debating a man like Biden.
I mean, first of all, how would you not start laughing?
But, you know, you can't respond to anything he says.
I mean, you would also probably feel bad saying mean things to him.
I mean, at some point you'd feel like you're just, you know, beating up a kitten or something.
I don't know.
Anyway, there's my hot takes on the debate.
I'll post this up.
I'm recording this on Friday.
So you will see this, well, whenever I feel like posting it up.

